STRUCTURING LEGAL ARGUMENTATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30888/2709-2267.2025-33-00-011Keywords:
legal argumentation, IRAC framework, issue identification, legal research, logical coherence, policy considerations, counter-argumentsAbstract
Legal argumentation forms the cornerstone of effective legal practice, requiring systematic approaches to structure compelling cases. This comprehensive analysis examines fundamental techniques including issue identification, legal research methodology, aReferences
Cebanu, A., Lupașcu, M. (2022). Fundamentele argumentării juridice în practica contemporană. Editura Cartier, Chișinău.
Cristea, V., Botnaru, S. (2021). Structurarea raționamentului juridic: metode și tehnici. Revista Moldovenească de Drept, 12(4), 23-41.
Smith, K., Johnson, M. (2023). Legal Argumentation and Reasoning: Foundations for Effective Advocacy. West Academic Publishing, New York.
Brown, A., Davis, J. (2022). The IRAC method in contemporary legal writing. Harvard Law Review, 135(3), 567-589.
Wilson, P., Thompson, R. (2021). Policy considerations in legal reasoning and judicial decision-making. Yale Law Journal, 130(7), 1234-1267.
Popescu, D., Ionescu, R. (2023). Tehnici de argumentare juridică și advocacy. Editura Universul Juridic, București.
Stanciu, C., Mihai, L. (2022). Structura logică a argumentării în practica juridică românească. Revista Română de Drept, 18(2), 45-68.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
